We're using cookies to make this site more secure, featureful and efficient.

Issue 2651: Possibly incorrect formation

Object
London Bridge (Dance)
Submitter
Iain Boyd
Assigned to
Chris Ronald
Priority
Normal
Disposition
Accepted
Description
'StateBlock' object has no attribute 'is_code_block' 
The first formation should probably be 'Reel of three - dancing couple plus one (REEL;DC+;R3;)' as in "The Back O' Bennachie" (which the dance strongly resembles) rather than 'Reel of three - across (REEL;ACROSS;R3;)'.

This explains why "The Back O' Bennachie" is not included in the search results for 2C dances with 'Reel of three - across'.

I have not checked the other dances from this search but I suspect that many, if not all, of the reels have been incorrectly defined.

Regards, 

Iain

Previous Actions

  • Date  Nov. 14, 2021, 9:28 p.m.
  • User  Unknown
'StateBlock' object has no attribute 'is_code_block' 
New issue submitted
  • Date  Nov. 14, 2021, 10:40 p.m.
  • User  Murrough Landon (murrough)
'StateBlock' object has no attribute 'is_code_block' 
_Assigned_ changed to »Chris« (previously »None«)  
_Disposition_ changed to »Accepted« (previously »New«)  

Thanks Iain. Given the limitations of the present formation system I think what you suggest makes sense. At least following a precedent of another dance with similarities.

I see Chris added this dance himself, though I may have added the formations on seeing the crib. Anyway I thought I would assign this issue to Chris for comment.